Navigating Legal Paths And Complexities

  1. Home
  2.  → 
  3. Nonprofit
  4.  → Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3)

Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3)

by | May 11, 2016 | Nonprofit |

Tax-exempt nonprofit corporations in this controversial election cycle need to be mindful of the restrictions related to political activity.  A reminder to 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations regarding specifically the absolute prohibition against support or opposition to political candidates is appropriate.

The IRS published the following article which succently explains the political candidate exemption:  

“The Restriction of Political Campaign Intervention by Section 501(c)(3) Tax-Exempt Organizations”

“Under the Internal Revenue Code, all section 501(c)(3) organizations are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office. Contributions to political campaign funds or public statements of position (verbal or written) made on behalf of the organization in favor of or in opposition to any candidate for public office clearly violate the prohibition against political campaign activity. Violating this prohibition may result in denial or revocation of tax-exempt status and the imposition of certain excise taxes.

Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances. For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity. In addition, other activities intended to encourage people to participate in the electoral process, such as voter registration and get-out-the-vote drives, would not be prohibited political campaign activity if conducted in a non-partisan manner.

On the other hand, voter education or registration activities with evidence of bias that (a) would favor one candidate over another; (b) oppose a candidate in some manner; or (c) have the effect of favoring a candidate or group of candidates, will constitute prohibited participation or intervention.

Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 15-Dec-2015″ (by the IRS)

L. Sue Loftin is the Founder and Managing Shareholder of The Loftin Firm. For questions relating to this blog or any other California real estate, corporate governance, land use, or estate planning matter, contact Ms. Loftin at .